Law enforcement and Australia’s 2001 heroin shortage Evaluating the evidence

Publication date:

Globally, illicit drug policy is largely based on two central policy objectives. The first is to reduce the demand for illegal drugs mainly through criminalisation, drug prevention and treatment, and the second is to reduce the supply of illegal drugs primarily through law enforcement initiatives. 

 

Re-Asserting Control: Voluntary Return, Restitution and the Right to Land for IDPs and Refugees in Myanmar - cover

About law enforcement and australia’s 2001 heroin shortage

Authors

Authors

  • Kora DeBeck et. al.
  • Evan Wood

However, the effort to promote government accountability has increased pressures on policy-makers to justify policy investments and provide scientific-based evidence in support of policy decisions. In the case of funding for supply reduction efforts, this has been difficult to accomplish. Rather, monitoring data on the price and availability of illegal drugs has long indicated that law enforcement is failing to achieve its supply reduction objectives. The lack of empirical evidence supporting the effectiveness of law enforcement-based policies is widely acknowledged. Beginning in early 2001 Australia experienced a severe heroin shortage and various investigations have examined the potential impact of law enforcement as a potential explanation.

February 2008
International Journal of Drug Policy 19 (2008) 287–290

Ideas into movement

Boost TNI's work

50 years. Hundreds of social struggles. Countless ideas turned into movement. 

Support us as we celebrate our 50th anniversary in 2024.

Make a donation